@Gelugon_baat @hitomo I see we admission anniversary other Dannystaples14 Dannystaples14 @aaronmullan Yeah because he has absolute amounts of time to accomplish the review. He apparently has like a two day borderline or something. Sometimes you just can't explain why you don't like something. Besides what the hell does it aggregate what assay annual he gives it? If you don't anticipate he did a adequate job afresh just abstain it. Assay array beggarly annihilation anyway. I've in actuality chock-full application them because I consistently acquisition they alter a lot from my gut aptitude and I commonly end up alienated a bold I adeptness contrarily admission enjoyed. How does his appraisal of it accomplish your adulation of the bold any less? Just because he can't put his feel on what it is that makes the bold not bell with him, doesn't aftereffect you in any way. dominoodle dominoodle @Infinite_713 @2zosteve TF2 on animate will be annihilation like the PC adaptation just fyi Gelugon_baat Gelugon_baat @Caldrin The point is that the numbers are for those who are too apathetic to read. That's the absolute acceptation of the annual system. Caldrin Caldrin @Gelugon_baat @CaldrinStill there admission to admission been some bad ponits... why they did not anticipate it bare a 10. I beggarly what is the point in a believability based scoring arrangement is they are just gonig to cull numbers out of the air. Why dont they jsut go yup with anticipate this bold is ambrosial adequate and leave it as that :) I beggarly that aggregate no has no acceptation at all on here. Gelugon_baat Gelugon_baat @Caldrin Infinite_713 has already told you the reason. Would you admission if anyone makes an allegory, e.g. the appraisement for a bold is not accustomed like how marks would be accustomed to an commodity in a accent subject? Gelugon_baat Gelugon_baat @Zhalor Mention one that you anticipate is 'better' then. themc_7 themc_7 @Gelugon_baat @themc_7 you apperceive if anyone uses big words to complete acute and win an argument? That's what we admission here. I'm not criticizing Gamespot's assay policies. I just don't admission why they'd go out of their way to rereview this game, but afresh about acknowledgment any of the updates or new agreeable to the game. themc_7 themc_7 @Gelugon_baat @themc_7 Acquiesce me to adduce my absolute 1st post: " This is an amazing game, but why assay it again? " Gelugon_baat Gelugon_baat @themc_7 I am accepting the aftereffect that you aren't actuality to altercate over the affirmation of a re-review. Rather, I doubtable that you are just analytic for any acumen to lambast GameSpot's assay policies. Gelugon_baat Gelugon_baat @themc_7 Oh, so now you change your tune from why Aggregation Breastwork 2 should not be re-reviewed because you said it has not afflicted abundant to arguing over the causes to re-review games. How convenient. Little annual why you can't "understand" what I am adage if you change your attitude so expediently. themc_7 themc_7 @Gelugon_baat @themc_7 I don't admission what your saying? "stubborn few who anticipate that something is the way it is because you admission it so and it could not be any added way." There is alone 1 baby annex in this absolute commodity about new TF2 actualization added than actualization aesthetics. I apperceive aggregation breastwork had added new agreeable aback lauch, but they about even acknowledgment it in the adapted review. Where's my re-review of Aura 2? They've added new agreeable aback barrage too! Why not assay it again? Draw the bandage somewhere. Gelugon_baat Gelugon_baat @themc_7 Well, you can consistently assay the "Patches" breadth of the game's official wiki. Yet, I get the aftereffect that you are one of those adamant few who anticipate that something is the way it is because you admission it so and it could not be any added way. themc_7 themc_7 @naryanrobinson @themc_7 abundant amateur breach great. I just don't admission why they'd assay it again. idk naryanrobinson naryanrobinson @themc_7 Able-bodied you're allurement why he advised it afresh and if you'd apprehend the authors agenda you'd admission accepted why he advised it again. I don't apperceive if you knew that but that's science. snxx snxx @hitomo I've been amphitheatre this bold for at atomic 5 years, haven't spent a dime on it (except for the original, Beef promo, price, aback I got it afore it went chargeless to play) and still had added than 300 hours of fun. Gelugon_baat Gelugon_baat